IGNOU MEC Project Work – IGNOU MEC Project Work is an application-oriented academic activity that seeks to hone your theoretical and quantitative abilities through their application in light of the theoretical information obtained while taking different MA Economics courses, most notably MEC-001, MEC-002, MEC-003, and MEC-109. An IGNOU MEC Project Work will help you to analyse a variety of economic events and circumstances encountered in everyday life. In a nutshell, it is a method of applying the information acquired via various courses to the difficulties and concerns raised by daily economic occurrences.
This IGNOU MEC Project Work is worth six credits and requires around 180 hours of total work to complete. IGNOU would prefer to receive your Project Report typed and bound. Your Project Report should be between 15000 and 20000 words in length (50-60 pages). Bear this in mind while selecting a theme for the project. The idea is that you should be able to express yourself completely within this word restriction. You may write your IGNOU MECP 101 Project Report in either English or Hindi.
IGNOU MEC Project Work Format
It is important to keep the reader in mind when writing an IGNOU MEC Project Work. Journal articles are designed for readers who are familiar with the subject’s general context but not with this specific study. When a reader’s attention is piqued, he or she is more likely to read the title first, then the abstract, and finally the body of the report. The following paragraphs are structured similarly to those seen in the majority of published texts. If you’re unsure about the right format or style, any publication published by the APA (American Psychological Association) or British Psychological Society (e.g., British Journal of Psychology) is a good place to start. The precise structure and data required will vary depending to the study’s subject, but the majority of research should follow to this framework fairly closely. Additionally, it is important to employ unique headers for sections (and sub-sections in the method section). If you do not utilise these locations effectively, you may face substantial marking penalties. The numbers beneath each heading are supplied to aid in arranging these remarks; they will not appear in the report.
1. The Title of the Study
A single sentence describing the inquiry should be in the title. The title is frequently used to refer to the independent and dependent variables. Thus, descriptive names such as The effect of sleep deprivation on gerbil exploratory behaviour and The effect of sleep deprivation on gerbil exploratory behaviour would be suitable. This is hardly an enticing title for gerbils. Avoid titles that imitate newspaper headlines (e.g., “Gerbil insomnia”); a formal report is not a journalistic assignment. Bear in mind that your reader will first notice the title of the report and will want to know if the report is relevant to his or her research interests. Your IGNOU Master of Economics dissertation title should be a short yet accurate description of the report’s content. Avoid using terms such as “a research into…” or “an experiment to discover…” in the opening of your title. Not only are such sentences redundant and contribute nothing to the text, they also reflect sloppy thinking. The phrase “title” is not acceptable as the initial word in a title. The reader will identify it as the title due to its placement.
2. The Abstract of the Study
The abstract describes the entire IGNOU MECP 101 Dissertation in a single paragraph. A short overview of the goal and approach should be provided, as well as sections on the findings and discussion. Exclude detailed information such as statistics and statistical test names from this section. Aim for a length of between 100 and 120 words for your abstract. The abstract is the second thing a reader sees after the title, and it may be the only thing they see (see the Psychological Abstracts in the library). As such, it should give a comprehensive yet brief overview of the whole report, allowing readers to decide whether to continue reading or not. As a general rule, write four short lines describing (1) why you did it, (2) what you did, (3) what you discovered, and (4) what you concluded. Write the abstract once you have completed the body of the report. You may struggle to write a succinct abstract in a single session. Perhaps it is more convenient to start with a lengthier version and then shorten it.
3. Introduction to the Study
To begin, you should defend the study you’re addressing. This implies that after reading the introduction, the reader should be able to deduce the subject of your IGNOU MECP 101 Project Report. Simultaneously, your introduction should explain to someone who is not an expert why you did this study. As a consequence, the introduction will begin with a general framework and go to the study’s specific reasoning and objectives. Typically, this section will include an overview of prior work in the subject, as well as an explanation of the theoretical or practical motives for doing the study. The following is an example of an effective content sequence for an introduction:
- Describe and identify the subject you wish to research, and, if necessary, justify its fascination and/or significance.
- Describe previous work (and maybe your own) that relates to the subject at hand.
Justify your previous work’s inadequacy. It might have methodological problems, or there could be need for extension of previous work, or this could be the first time it has been reproduced, or you could be comparing the sufficiency of various theories. (If the previous work is complete, error-free, and has been repeated several times, or if the best hypothesis is known, further research is unnecessary.) Justifications for why previous work was inadequate should logically lead to the study you did. You are not need to go into detail here, but it should be obvious how the most recent work resolves open theoretical issues, corrects past research’s mistakes, and/or enhances our present understanding.
What are your expectations for the result of your study, and why? Complete this section by describing your study hypothesis (what you expect will happen based on your theoretical framework and/or the constraints of previous studies). If you are performing more exploratory research and are unclear about the conclusion, briefly describe the study’s aims and desired outcomes. This final paragraph of the introduction is critical to the study’s and report’s comprehension. If this part is well-defined, discussing and evaluating the outcomes will be lot easier. Ascertain the relevance of your theories to the essay’s main body. Your theories do not have to be enumerated or bulleted.
4. The Study’s Methodology of Research
Rather of being a standalone part, the method section is divided into the following five or so subsections. In the approach section, you describe the steps you used to acquire your data. This portion of the IGNOU MEC Project Work should include sufficient detail to enable the reader to reproduce the experiment, but not too so. For example, when investigating the influence of word types on the capacity to recall lists of such words, it is important to consider the characteristics of the words included in the lists. Unless you were specifically investigating the effect of seating arrangements on memory, you would not be needed to describe how participants sat at a desk in detail. Regrettably, the important and irrelevant portions of an inquiry vary depending on the investigation. If you’re still unsure, read over a journal paper on your subject to see if additional details have been added. All material in the method section should be contained under one of the subheadings below. If the contents are straightforward, the equipment and materials sections may be removed; nevertheless, further sub-parts will always be necessary.
5. The Study’s Conclusions
Begin by outlining the actions you took to process the data. This implies that you must explain how you arrived at your scores through the aggregation of each participant’s replies. If each participant has completed 40 questions and you are more interested in the total percentage of right answers than (or in addition to) the performance on each individual question, you should specify as such. You must defend your choice to exclude particular data (i.e., provide a “exclusion criterion”).
Utilize descriptive statistics to provide a clear, brief overview of the data. In a basic experiment, this is generally achieved by including the means and standard deviations for each condition in the text that follows the data treatment. Frequently, descriptive data is provided in a table as part of a more in-depth investigation (with numerous dependent measures or three or more conditions). When presenting descriptive data, graphs typically outperform tables or text. This is commonly used to demonstrate a sequence of events or to convey a complicated pattern of information (e.g., an interaction between two variables).
Each table and figure should be assigned a unique number and captioned with information about the variables, circumstances, and units of measurement. Additionally, verify that the axes are labelled appropriately. Additionally, if a graph or table is utilised, it must be cited within the IGNOU MEC Project Work’s body. In other words, your reader should understand when you’re about to utilise a figure or table.
Means and standard deviations may be unsuitable in particular situations; rather, other descriptive statistics may be more useful. When evaluating count or frequency data, percentages are beneficial. Correlation coefficients are usually the most informative descriptive statistics when it comes to assessing relationships. Effect size measures are often used and can be combined with other descriptive statistics or statistical tests.
Never copy and paste the output of a statistical software into your report. Always assess what information is pertinent and important and then communicate it without repetition in the most efficient manner possible.
In your results section, use the same descriptive labels that you did in your technique section. This will be beneficial to your reader.
Frequently, descriptive statistics are used with inferential statistics (statistical tests that help you decide what to conclude about the data). It should be self-evident who conducted the tests and with what data. For the majority of statistical tests, the p-value should be accompanied with a test statistic (such as the t-value) (e.g., a t-test). Frequently, further information is required (e.g., the degrees of freedom). You’ll have to determine this for yourself.
Download Links for IGNOU MEC Project Work Sample Pdf
To download the Sample PDFs, you must click on the following link;